Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 9 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 313 contributions

|

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 1 May 2025

Ash Regan

Would other panel members like to come back in on my previous question on annual reports? You can add your thoughts on parliamentary scrutiny in general, perhaps commenting on how often you appear before committees and whether you feel that you are being asked appropriate questions when you do so.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 1 May 2025

Ash Regan

You mentioned the five-yearly independent review of the commission’s performance that is required to be conducted. Is that process working well, and is that timeframe appropriate? If recommendations come out of that review, what is the process for ensuring that they are implemented in a timely fashion?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 1 May 2025

Ash Regan

It does.

My final question is about the Government’s arrangements. Depending on your organisation, each of you will have a set of arrangements, which the Scottish Government enforces, on how you are monitored. Have you any further thoughts on whether those arrangements are effective and appropriate? Do they work well?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 1 May 2025

Ash Regan

Good morning. You will have seen that the committee is interested in understanding as much as possible about how well the Parliament’s approaches to scrutiny and accountability are working for the various commissions and supported bodies. Earlier, you mentioned annual reports, which is a topic that has come up over the past few weeks. Does the Parliament scrutinise such reports effectively, and does it use them appropriately?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Ash Regan

Yes.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Ash Regan

This has been an interesting discussion so far.

The committee rightly has a strong interest in how the accountability and scrutiny mechanisms are, or are not, working, depending on how people see that.

My first question is for Dr Elliott. Your written submission identified a number of additional reforms, including ideas such as having new funding models and linking back to the outcomes that we are seeking to achieve. Please expand a little on your thinking.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Ash Regan

That is useful.

Dr Lamont, the committee has already had a few discussions about annual reporting, where that is working and where it is not working, and there is a suggestion that the SPCB has the power to determine the contents of annual reports. What are your thoughts on that? Are those reports meaningful enough? Is the information in them actionable enough for the parliamentary committees?

11:00  

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Ash Regan

Is the content of the reports appropriate and is that process working or does that need to be improved?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Ash Regan

Yes, I think that it does.

The committee is very much grappling with the question of whether, as a Parliament, we are managing to accurately measure the outcomes in relation to what the commissioners, particularly the advocacy-based ones, are producing. Could the process of measuring outcomes be improved? Is the Parliament managing to scrutinise these bodies effectively?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Ash Regan

The next question is for Dr Gill. Your report discusses the importance of clear responsibilities in the area of oversight. How can that oversight responsibility be enhanced or clarified to increase accountability and to reduce duplication?

OSZAR »